This examines how the three modern religious movements of Theosophy, Bábísm, and the Bahá’í Faith each followed a comparable sociological trajectory from early radicalism toward formal apoliticism. Although these traditions emerged with politically charged, reformist, or socially disruptive impulses, they gradually adopted doctrines of political non‑involvement as part of pressures, their institutional consolidation and global identity formation. By tracing these parallel shifts, this article identifies a recurring pattern of depoliticization in new religious movements, showing how initial charismatic or revolutionary energies are transformed into universalist, and explicitly apolitical frameworks claimed to be supra-political or meta-political.
There is a shared sociological pattern of radical movements, as in case of the early historical roots of Theosophy, the Bábi movement and Bahá’í Faith. This distinct sociological and doctrinal trajectory marks the shift from early radical or disruptive engagement with existing power to a formal, institutionalized doctrine of non-involvement in the partisan politics, policies, and controversies of present-day states. Babism refers to the movement and religion founded by the Persian Mirza Ali Muhammad of Shiraz (1819-50) popularly known as the Báb (“Gate”) who taught that a new prophet that followed Muhammad would emerge. The Báb’s movement (1844-1850) was anti-clerical, against the Qajar state, socially disruptive, apocalyptic, critical of the state and militantly involved in armed struggle. Bahá’u’lláh (1817-1892), whose teachings became the foundations of the Bahá’í Faith, was originally a prominent follower of the Báb. After the Báb’s execution, Bahá’u’lláh emerged as the leader of the Bábí community, and in 1863, he publicly declared himself the Promised One foretold by the Báb.
Bahá’u’lláh and later ʻAbdu’l-Bahá adopted an apolitical posture, while Bahá’u’lláh’s younger half-brother Ṣobḥ-e Azal maintained the revolutionary, anti-establishment ethos of Bábi roots with its anti-state attitude, seeing political injustice as a spiritual problem, and resistance to unjust rule as moral. Like Sayyid ʿAlī‑Muḥammad Shīrāzī (the Báb), Azal taught a distinctive non‑clerical, gnostic philosophy within the Bábi movement, that diverged from the, at the time, emerging Bahá’í orientation. Bábísm began with millenarian militancy and open conflict with the Qajar order. Bahá’u’lláh himself issued the Tablets to the Kings by direct, public summonses to Napoleon III, Queen Victoria, Násiri’d-Dín Sháh, the Ottoman Sultan, and others, calling rulers to justice, warning of consequences, and articulating reform.
Subscribe to continue reading
Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.